...help me to understand this more and more
one post-industrial city to the next
detroit was a very hard city to love. i think its condition is unique to the rest in that most of the housing and business isn't even liveable/sustainable. how can it be when most of it has been burned down by the city's own residents? i eventually did come to love it. now, my time in the area is up as i'm moving along the great lakes to another post-industrial city, cleveland, that has it's own set of problems. however, i don't think i can ever forget the first time i was exposed to poverty and inequality in my hometown of rochester during flower city work camp (city-wide church youth group mission). it's just hard to think about going home though, when there seems to be so much to do in detroit and cleveland. it's also just hard to have the emotional capacity to think about another depressed, mid-sized city, even if it is my hometown.
thanks to sophia--an article in the nytimes about rochester:
The city has six universities, yet fewer than half of the ninth graders in Rochester’s public schools go on to earn their diplomas. Rochester has a thriving high-tech industry — and the number of patents its companies and residents have been granted is among the highest per capita in the nation — but one-quarter of its residents live in poverty.
“What you have in Rochester are people who are quite well-educated, wealthy and white living alongside people who have none of these attributes,” said John M. Klofas, a professor of criminal justice at the Rochester Institute of Technology. “The result is a growing culture of separation.”
Rochester, which has lost 40 percent of its population in the past three decades, now has about 80,000 white residents and 80,000 black residents, according to United States Census Bureau statistics. But of the 50,000 people living below the poverty line, 32,000 of them are black."
weep weep weep!